Skip to content

Procurement Pilot

Terminus M5 Negotiation decisioning

Part of Synlogica Terminus

Terminus M5 runs supplier negotiation rounds as multiple equivalent simultaneous offers instead of one price ladder, with your real alternative stated in time and inventory rather than assumed. Built for API and excipient procurement, where supplier qualification is the binding constraint.

Terminus M5 negotiation round — three equivalent simultaneous offers side by side with the stated BATNA
Negotiation Hub — API supplier claims, transport RFQs and commodity alerts in one worklist

The problem

Negotiation decisioning

When the supplier is qualified and the alternative is eighteen months of requalification, a price negotiation is not a negotiation. The buyer walks in with a target and no stated alternative; the supplier knows it. The playbook exists — MESO framing, a qualified BATNA — but it lives in a training slide, not in the round.

What it does

  1. 01 Builds each round as a set of equivalent offers — price, volume, term, payment — so the supplier reveals what they value instead of anchoring on one number.
  2. 02 States your BATNA in the units that matter: months of inventory, time to requalify, cost of a second source — and updates it as the round moves.
  3. 03 Records every offer, response and rationale as a decision package, so procurement can defend the outcome and reuse the pattern.
Terminus M5 offer history — responses and rationale recorded per round
API Negotiator — price claims, market intel and renegotiation opportunities per substance

Who it is for

Procurement and supply-chain teams negotiating APIs, excipients and critical materials with qualified suppliers. In pilot; until it ships, this work runs with people, using the same playbook.

Where it stands

Pilot Pilot — in use with early customers. Scope, data and success criteria are agreed per pilot, and we say what is production and what is prototype before you ask.

Key capabilities

Terminus M5

  • 01

    Unified negotiation inbox

    API supplier price claims, transport RFQs and commodity alerts in one worklist, with a rollout checklist that reports readiness from live data.

  • 02

    Price claims with outcomes

    Every supplier price-increase request registered, argued and closed with an outcome, so avoided increases and cost avoidance are measured, not remembered.

  • 03

    Commodity feeds and alerts

    Price series mapped to substances with scheduled alerts and a price outlook per substance, explained with the events behind it.

  • 04

    Contracts, BOM cost drivers and evidence packs

    Supplier contracts and priced bills of material give the negotiation its facts; an evidence pack PDF goes to the supplier with the claim.

  • 05

    Package negotiations and market intel

    Multiple offers negotiated as one package, with market intelligence delivered only through the intel service — never a model called from the decision path.

Three decisions, one engine

Where regulated teams lose time and money

Three decision domains, each a Terminus module sharing one governed decision framework — so rules, versioning and the audit trail behave identically whether the question is a temperature excursion, a freight tender or a supplier price.

Terminus M4

Quality

Temperature excursions assessed with Arrhenius + Monte-Carlo against the product's stability model — a recommendation with stated uncertainty, not a reviewer's guess.

See Terminus M4 →
Terminus M1

Transport

Tender leakage measured across SKU × lane × month, lanes scored by tail-risk — so spot-freight inflation is caught before invoices reconcile.

See Terminus M1 →
Terminus M5

Negotiation

MESO playbooks for API procurement — simultaneous-equivalent offers framed against a qualified BATNA when supplier qualification is the binding constraint.

See Terminus M5 →
Validation & governance

Terminus M4 is being validated under Synlogica's Integrated Management System (IMS) — ISO 9001 (quality), ISO 27001 (information security) and ISO 42001 (AI management) — on top of its GAMP 5 Category 4 lifecycle.

IMS certification target Q4 2026

The same foundation as every Synlogica application

Every application in the portfolio carries the same controls, so an inspector who has seen one knows how to read the next.

  • Versioned records — a record can be superseded, never silently altered.
  • Electronic signature on every controlled step.
  • An audit trail an inspector can follow, hash-chained end to end.
  • Runs on your own tenant, hosted in the EU.

Talk to us

Talk about Terminus M5

Bring a real case — a recent excursion, an invoice you doubted, a procedure that just changed — and we walk it through together. If it is not a problem for software, we will say so.